The last few weeks has seen a flurry of activity.
On the positive side our PR team and advisers won a global award for their work on this debate; a clear signal that it is recognised as a serious and mature debate and one that has created impact - and is hopefully creating change (even if only modestly).
We also saw the first response from a Big Four firm to the LSE research - aside the various "sound bites" in the few days after its initial publication. I must say that I found this response disappointing as it didn't actually address the issues raised by the LSE research and whilst very briefly criticising their methodology didn't say why. Indeed, it sought to suggest that there wasn't even a problem.
I guess you could say this was positive as by not having a serious response by implication it suggested that the LSE methodology is robust and by failing to address the real issues perhaps accepted that there is no substantive response - thus accepting that the research does prove there is distortion in the UK audit market - and that the only response is to pretend there isn't an issue. I was disappointed, however, as we commissioned and published the LSE research to prompt a serious debate - not to trade sound bites and personal comments.
So this is a plea to all those with an interest in this issue to join the discussion and engage on a serious basis.