Reputation is a “key consideration” says BDO, as reported fraud plummets over 6 month period19 April 2013
“Fraud reporting habits are increasingly being influenced by fear of reputational damage” says Simon Bevan, Head of Fraud Services at BDO LLP, as the accountancy firm releases its 2012 Interim FraudTrack report.
The total value of reported fraud plummeted to £424m between December 2011 and May 2012, according to figures released today by BDO. The firm’s latest interim FraudTrack report, which analyses reported fraud cases in the UK worth more than £50k, indicated a 54% drop on last year’s figure (£920m), in addition to a 55% decline in the average value of fraud, which fell from £4.5m to £2m. At the same time, however, there has been an increase in the number of cases reported, with 212 cases between December 2011 to May 2012, in comparison with 204 in the same 2011 period, suggesting that organisations are only reporting simple, low value frauds to the authorities.
The figures coincide with a period of intense media scrutiny on corporate issues and organisational malpractice which, BDO believes, is at the heart of this behavioural change. This, coupled with intense pressure to protect revenues in the current economic climate, means that organisations are increasingly weighing up the financial implications of taking a fraud hit internally, against facing the reputational consequences of reporting a fraud. At the same time, well publicised funding cuts and problems with high profile investigations have sent a clear signal to UK organisations that the authorities are facing difficulties when it comes to dealing effectively with fraud.
Simon Bevan commented: “This really is a dramatic fall. This year’s interim figures are not even a quarter of last year’s total, which was more than £2bn between December 2010 and November 2011. That said, it’s important to remember that these only represent fraud which is reported to the police. In fact, it is in the area of civil investigations and prosecutions in which BDO is most active. We certainly haven’t seen less fraud occurring.
So what does it tell us? Despite this drop in value, we’re actually seeing more cases going through the system, but of lower value. We suspect that organisations are only bringing in the authorities for small, relatively simple frauds. If that’s the case, I’m in no doubt that reputation management is a key factor in this decision. Organisations just don’t want to air their dirty linen in public. It would appear that the police are no longer the first port of call when it comes to dealing with the larger, complex frauds that can be so damaging to reputation.
We’ve certainly seen this in our own work. Whilst quantum has historically been the key driver for our appointment in fraud investigations, reputational issues have become much more important. Organisations are increasingly aware of the impact that reputational damage can have in terms of loss of earnings, loss of future customers, unsettled employees, increased regulatory oversight and damage to share price, amongst other things!
There are other reputational issues at stake that can have far reaching consequences. Take for example a case where a fraudster convinces the accounts payable team to change supplier contact details and bank account details. This is a simple fraud but something we are seeing increasingly, the result being that millions are then paid away to a bogus account. The reputational impact of a supplier not receiving their payment on time is significant. Such circumstances could force that supplier to reconsider their association with you and ultimately affect your ability to run your organisation. Most frauds like this one are not complex and could easily be prevented by simple due diligence, but one thing they do have in common is their impact on your reputation”.
Breakdown by sector
- Public administration has seen the highest value of fraud reported in this 6 month period, accounting for almost £253m – 60% of the all fraud reported. This has fallen 41% from the 2011 figure of £431m.
- The Finance & Insurance Sector accounts for 17% of all fraud in the period (£71m). This has fallen 74% from 2011 when the recorded figure was £274m.
- Fraud in the retail sector stands at £49m, just 12% of the total figure. However, this has risen dramatically from last year’s figure of £11m – a fourfold increase.
Simon Bevan commented: “The only sector where we’ve seen an increase in the value of fraud reported is in retail. This is a sector which is currently under a lot of pressure, so this isn’t particularly surprising. Fraudulent activity is often uncovered when businesses are paying closer attention to their finances, especially in situations such as property acquisition and store refurbishment.”
Breakdown by type of fraud
- Tax fraud accounts for the greatest amount, at £249.5m - 59% of all fraud for this period.
- After tax fraud, management fraud accounts for 9% (£39m).
- Mortgage fraud is down dramatically from last year’s figures, currently sitting at around £9m (just 2% of total fraud) in comparison to last year’s £82m.
- Employee fraud counts for £34m (around 8%) – again, down significantly on the same period last year (£192m).
- Procurement fraud has dropped dramatically, from £25m last year to £3m in 2012.
- Third party fraud has more than halved in the same period from £78m between December 2010 and May 2011, to £30m in the last 6 months.
Breakdown by location
For the first time in 6 years, London has not been the location with the highest amount of reported fraud.
- The Midlands: £184m
- London: £165m
- North East: £38m
- East Anglia: £16m
- North West: £9m
- West Country: £5m
- National: £4m
- Northern Ireland: £1m
- Wales: £1m
- Scotland: £700k
Protecting your reputation during a fraud incident:
- Keep the numbers of people who know about the fraud to a minimum, eg, CEO and FD
- Make sure your investigation is seen to be independent
- Consider civil action over criminal action – you can do a deal on the courtroom steps
- Make sure the investigation is wide-ranging and not too narrow in scope
- Have a good and open relationship with your regulator
Notes to Editors
Simon Bevan is Head of Fraud Services at BDO LLP. He has over twenty five years experience of investigating fraud both in the UK and numerous international locations.
FraudTrack is prepared by BDO and this report is based on all reported fraud cases of over £50,000 and from 1 December 2011 to 31 May 2012. The sources for the database are publicly available and include the UK’s national, regional and local press.
Caveat: A large reported case of around £350 million involving money laundering of the proceeds of crime has been removed from the half-year figures to ensure the figures include pure fraud only.
BDO LLP, a UK limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC305127, is a member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms. A list of members' names is open to inspection at our registered office, 55 Baker Street, London W1U 7EU. BDO LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority to conduct investment business.
The combined fee income of all the BDO Member Firms, including the members of their exclusive alliances, was €4.06 billion in 2011. The global network provides business advisory services in 135 countries, with almost 48,800 people working out of 1,118 offices, worldwide.
BDO is the brand name for the BDO International network and for each of the BDO Member Firms.
BDO Northern Ireland, a partnership formed in and under the laws of Northern Ireland, is licensed to operate within the international BDO network of independent member firms.
BDO LLP has a clear ambition to be the firm known in the market for exceptional service delivered by empowered people. The 2011/12 Mid Market Monitor analysis – completed in April 2012 – shows that BDO has now indeed become market leader for client satisfaction – outperforming all its major competitors and the only organisation to see an improvement over the past three years.