This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our privacy policy for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.

Will a narrower scope save the EU’s digital tax proposals?

07 December 2018

Resistance to the EU Commission proposals for an interim tax on digital services, to be put in place until the OECD has agreed a global approach, has been growing in recent months: it was widely expected that the proposals would be sidelined or dropped at a meeting of EU finance ministers on 4 December. Ireland, Luxembourg, Denmark, Finland, and Sweden were expected to oppose the proposals – in part because of fears of retaliatory action by the USA.  

EU rules require unanimous agreement from all member states to implement new tax rules. Therefore, in a bid to keep some form of interim digital tax reform on the EU agenda, immediately before the meeting, the French and German finance ministries proposed a new, much narrower, version of a digital tax. 

The new draft proposals would impose a 3% tax on advertising revenues generated in the digital economy – so Google, Facebook and online giants with similar business models would be expected to be subject to the tax. However, excluding activities like platform services and the sale of user-generated data will mean that most online retailers such as EBay and Amazon would not be within the scope of the proposed tax.  

As with the EU Commission’s original proposals, the proposed tax would only be an interim measure: it is suggested that the new tax would only take effect if the OCED cannot put global standards in place by 2021. However, the French and German governments propose that this plan for an advertising based tax is agreed by March 2019 at the latest. While the timescale for agreement is related to the EU parliament elections in May 2019, EU wide agreement before 29 March 2019 would also tie the UK into the plans, superseding the UK’s own proposals for a broader based digital service tax.   

It is notable that this would be a minimum agreed scope within the EU, and flexibility would be retained for individual member states to introduce broader measures.

It remains to be seen whether any new digital tax will be acceptable to some EU member states or whether the proposals go far enough for others. Therefore, it is quite possible that countries will take matters into their own hands and that a patchwork of different rules will emerge before the OECD can achieve agreed international standards. 

Business Edge Index